CATEGORY:Recognising competence

Workplace Myths

It is so easy to believe in myths.

We are conditioned to believe. From childhood, we hear our parents and elders caution us or advise us about various myths.

“Friday the thirteenth inevitably brings bad luck.”

“If your right palm itches, you are likely to receive money.”

“Walking under a ladder will lead to sorrow.”

Most myths are beliefs or practices that result from one of five causes :

1. Ignorance
2. Fear of the unknown
3. Trust in magic, luck or chance
4. A false conception of causation
5. An irrational attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God

Similarly, workplace myths, too, abound.

A lot of these myths start off as well-intentioned business and leadership observations. Sadly, they take on the garb of wisdom, and over time, are believed as if they were gospel.

Here are 5 workplace myths that research has proven wrong. You have surely heard of these. You have possibly believed these myths.

Let us bust these myths once and for all!

Myth # 1 : Longer Hours = More Productivity

Since I started working many years ago, I have always been told that putting in extra hours is the sure route to achievement and success.

“See that colleague – he works 14 hours every day, and his career is sky-rocketing.”

Research has conclusively proved that employees are actually more productive when they work shorter days.

In one case, using a time-tracking productivity app called DeskTime, the Draugiem Group conducted an experiment to understand the habits of the most productive employees.

They found that the employees with the highest productivity did not work longer hours than their counterpart. In fact, they did not even work full eight-hour days.

Instead, the most productive employees took a 17-minute break for every 52 minutes of work.

Built in breaks and shorter workdays actually enable employees to be their most productive.

In fact, the reverse is true. Working longer hours can, in fact, lead to greater operational costs and negative health effects, such as sleep deprivation, which can threaten productivity.

Myth # 2 : High Achievers = Great Managers

How often have we seen a superb sales representative being promoted to a sales manager’s role and then failing spectacularly.

“Rajan has surpassed his sales targets 3 years in a row. Let us promote him to Sales Manager!” And 6 months later, “I am afraid we will need to let Rajan go – he is just not up to the task!”

There is a clear difference between performing and managing.

Performance is necessary to be a manager, but not sufficient.

To be high achiever, one needs to bring out the best in oneself. To be a great manager, one needs to be able to understand, interact with and bring the best out of people.

Research has found that managers who don’t have the ability to improve the productivity of their people fail at twice the rate of average-quality managers.

So being a great manager takes more than just being great at your job. You need to understand your people and their capabilities and make them great performers, too.

Myth # 3 : Higher Salaries = Happier Employees

“I think George may be thinking of leaving us. We should increase his salary so that he stays.”

Salary is important.

But salary is not a motivator. It can cause dissatisfaction, but it can never satisfy. It is a ‘hygiene’ factor.

The best research in this area is Frederick Herzberg’s in motivation and hygiene factors, and their impact on morale and productivity.

Herzberg showed that the there are two kinds of factors in the workplace – motivators (satisfying factors) and dissatisfiers (hygiene factors). The proper management of hygiene factors can prevent employee dissatisfaction, but these factors can never serve as a source of motivation.

A good salary, for instance, will keep employees at a job but does not motivate them to work harder. But poor salaries may make employees look elsewhere and quit.

A manager who wants to increase employee satisfaction and happiness needs to focus on the motivators. A job with many satisfying factors will usually motivate workers, provide job satisfaction, and prompt effective performance.

Satisfying factors include recognition, responsibility, advancement, job satisfaction and growth.

Hygiene factors include salary, job security, workplace conditions and supervision.

Myth # 4 : Happy Workplace = Zero Conflict

Most of us believe that workplace disagreements are undesirable.

Such disagreements indicate tension and disconnect, distract team members from doing their jobs, and therefore damage productivity.

But research reveals just the opposite: in many cases, disagreements fuel better performance.

Most workplace disagreements fall into one of two categories:

1. relationship conflicts, which involve personality clashes, and
2. task conflicts, which focus on how work is performed.

Studies indicate that while relationship conflicts are indeed detrimental, task conflicts produce better decisions and stronger financial outcomes.

Healthy debate encourages group members to think more deeply, scrutinize alternatives, and avoid premature consensus.

While many of us view conflict as unpleasant, the experience of open deliberation can actually energize employees by providing them with better strategies for doing their job.

Workplaces that avoid disagreements in an effort to maintain group harmony are doing themselves a disservice. Far better to create an environment in which thoughtful debate is encouraged.

Myth # 5 : Open Plan = More Engagement

“Let us move to an open plan office – that will help our employees engage more and collaborate better!”

Theoretically, open plan offices should encourage more interaction.

With no cubicles or walls to divide staff, open plan offices were originally planned to increase collaboration within teams and workplaces.

But a 2018 study from researchers at Harvard University suggests the design could be counterproductive.

Comparing the experiences of employees at two Fortune 500 companies before and after a move to open plan, the researchers found that face-to-face time between employees decreased by around 70% while the use of email increased in the range of 22-50%.

Why?

One, the drive for increased interaction and collaboration comes at the expense of the ability to focus and concentrate. Continuous distractions make it hard for employees to focus. This results in increasing stress and errors, undermining performance and productivity. This forces employees to work harder and longer; causing them to eschew interaction with others so they can complete their tasks.

Two, engagement and interaction are not products of workspace configuration. They are outcomes of culture, workplace environment, team-structure and role definitions.

Tradition Is Obsolete

Five common workplace myths busted!

By now, you should have realized that these myths have been believed for so many years only because we fell prey to tradition.

“This is how it was always done, so this is how we must continue to do it.”

Break out of that mindset. It is a prison that shackles you and prevents you from innovating and growing.

Look at every myth that you have accepted. Question it. Evaluate it. And then, discard it or embrace it based on the value it brings to your workplace.

What is the myth you want to bust today?

****

Do send your inputs to me, either as a comment or as a PM.

Cheers | Shesh | Singapore | 24 November 2020.

Post Script :

1. For other interesting CEO Chronicles click here.
2. Follow me so that you don’t miss the next issue of CEO Chronicles.

#BillionDollarLearnings #radicaladvice #ceochronicles #purpose #mentoring #careers #career #careeradvice #careerguidance #bestadvice #personaldevelopment

Performance appraisal can do more harm then good…

“You Can Do Better. Much Better.”

“Mom! I scored 95% in Math!” I cried, excited.

“Good, well done,” my mother said, “but why did you not get 100%? You can do better, much better!”

My head and spirits fell.

This happened every time! However well I did, I was told that I could do better. How much ever I achieved, I was told I could achieve more. It was never enough!

It was frustrating. And it was demotivating. Most of all, it was hurting.

Many years later, my mother and I had a chat about this.

She was genuinely surprised.

“I only wanted what is best for you, my son,” she said. “I wanted you to know that you could achieve what you set out to do, and that there were no limits.”

“It was never my intention to hurt you or demotivate you,” she continued, an apology in her eyes.

I understood. I knew where she was coming from.

Just the previous week, my son came to me and said, “Daddy, I have completed the Lego model – see, here it is!

And I said, “Oh, it looks great, my son! But, what about this section – it seems a little misaligned. You can do better, much better!”

Appraisal Is A Double-Edged Sword

What exactly is appraisal or feedback?

This term is used to describe the evaluation or criticism about a person’s or entity’s actions or behaviours. The objective of this evaluation is that they can use that information to adjust and improve current and future actions and behaviours.

Feedback occurs when an environment reacts to an action or behavior.

‘Customer feedback’ is the buyers’ reaction to a company’s products, services, or policies.

‘Performance appraisal’ is the manager’s or peer’s reaction to an employee’s performance and behaviour.

In both cases, the exchange of information involves both performance exhibited and performance expected.

The Pros

There is no question that, in theory, feedback is a good thing.

Individuals, teams, business units, companies, governments – all can benefit from appraisal.

Myriad studies have proven that feedback helps to improve and enhance; contributes to better informed decisions; lays the foundation for continuous dialogue.

Effective feedback, in theory, has benefits for the giver, the receiver, and the wider organization.

And The Cons

In practice, the appraisal process can be and usually is demotivating and hurting.

In most organizations, feedback creates an atmosphere of fear. More than 85% of employees say that receiving feedback is a negative experience.

Also, feedback is victim to natural biases and errors.

It can lead to a stressful workplace, unhappy relationships, and fear and toxicity within teams.

Sadly, what is supposedly Panacea in theory, turns out to be Poison in practice…

Feedback, Feedback Everywhere!

In reality, whether we like it or not, feedback is around us everywhere.

We judge and are being judged all the time.

At home, at work, with friends, by colleagues, online and offline.

“Oh, look at Roger, what kind of shirt is he wearing? He must be colour-blind!”

“I wish Sheila would complete her tasks on time; she is always late!”

“Can’t Peter check his e-mails before sending? So many mistakes, every time!”

A lot of feedback is covert. Much of feedback is indirect. Often, issues are largely hinted at rather than expressed.

And therein lies the problem.

We need to be able to crystallize these judgements. To convert them into a form that can be heard, understood and responded to, openly and transparently.

So, the corporate world adopted the concept of Performance Appraisal. So that feedback is given and received, documented and reviewed, with the hope that employees will use this to enhance their behaviour and performance.

My Appraisal Is Your Criticism

Sadly, performance appraisals traditionally carried out annually are useless. They suffer from too many problems–

• Most managers are untrained in evaluation
• Appraisals are rarely based on hard, objective data – they are mostly subjective
• They are infrequent, with huge gaps in between appraisals, leading to errors of recency and central tendency
• Appraisals try to tick off too many boxes – improvement, development, promotion, bonus, retention – at one time
• Appraisals are seen to fuel greed and unhealthy competition

Research shows that these problems lead to an unusual outcome –

Appraisals actually worsen employee performance in 40% of cases!

Over the past few years, organizations have become increasingly aware that the annual performance appraisal is a fundamentally broken process that is irrelevant to and ineffective for the modern workforce.

Exiting The Spiral

“So how do we make feedback deliver positive outcomes?” I asked my mentor.

“There are three rules I have always followed,” she replied.

“One, make the feedback process continuous.”

“Two, make the process about motivation, not measurement.”

“Three, use the process to align, coach and develop, rather than evaluate. Prepare them for the future, rather than going over their past.”

“The very first time I implemented this, I carried out a survey with my team. These were the outcomes :”

• the reviews were more objective and fairer
• they were of the right quality and timeliness
• the reviews actually helped improve their performance.

“Most importantly, my employee retention numbers shot up by almost 12%, thus increasing organizational stability and recruitment costs.”

“So, what were the steps you took to implement this new approach?” I asked, fascinated.

Poison To Panacea

“First, I made goal setting a quarterly process,” said my mentor. “Most people cannot envision something 9-10 months away. By focusing them on the quarter ahead, we made things more real and immediate.”

“Secondly, I coached my managers to focus performance-related conversations on future growth and development, rather than looking backwards at quotas and deadlines. By doing this, we reduced tension and anxiety, and people became much more open to the feedback.”

“Third, I established a Weekly Review template for each employee, that they would full-up and share with their manager, so as to ensure that tracking is continuous, rather than sporadic. So, every month, and then, every quarter, the manager and the employee could review the behaviour and performance across the whole period, and plan how to do better.”

“Finally, I used technology to make this happen. Paper-based systems are cumbersome and difficult. The moment I digitized the system, it started working like clockwork. HR did not have to chase after people. The system’s reminders and flags were enough to keep the discipline.”

“How long did this take?” I asked.

“Oh, it did not happen overnight!” she replied. “As always, there was resistance in the beginning, and excuses and delays. But, within 3 months the foundation was laid; within 6 months, we were fully switched over.”

“That must have taken a lot of hard work!” I exclaimed.

“Yes, Shesh, but not only did this change the atmosphere and level of trust in the company,” said my mentor, “it led to much better performance!”

“We started winning more deals, our margins improved, our customer satisfaction numbers rose.”

“Even McKinsey’s research has shown clearly that organizations that have a continuous performance appraisal system in place are three times as likely to outperform the competition.”

“Wow!” I exclaimed, “that is news to me!”

“Well,” she smiled wryly, “all of us managers say people are our most important asset, but we rarely behave like we mean it. The fact is that if you build the right ecosystem that motivates and engages your people, they will create miracles you never dreamt of!”

“Amen to that!” I said.

Focus On The Appraiser, Not The Appraisal

The best managers in the world are effective coaches.

They constantly create moments where genuine dialogue can occur, where employees feel their valued and cared for.

The best performance appraisal approaches in the world are those:

• That encourage continuous conversations that engage and encourage employees.
• That offer tools and metrics that help motivate and develop.
• That help prepare for the future, rather than conduct post mortems of the past.

The ideal performance management system is a manager who cares for his team.

****

Do send your inputs to me, either as a comment or as a PM.

Cheers | Shesh | Singapore | 03 November 2020.

Post Script :

1. For other interesting CEO Chronicles click here.
2. Follow me so that you don’t miss the next issue of CEO Chronicles.

#BillionDollarLearnings #radicaladvice #ceochronicles #purpose #mentoring #careers #career #careeradvice #careerguidance #bestadvice #personaldevelopment